|
|||||||
Research |
|||||||
Working Papers Job Market Paper: Government Efficiency in Facilitating Innovation Abstract: I study the effectiveness of federal R&D contracts in stimulating private sector innovation. I develop a model that outlines a firm's tradeoffs after receiving government funds. Winning a contract may signal that the firm has better R&D prospects, increasing R&D expense. Alternatively, the firm may divert existing R&D funds to other uses, muting its responsiveness to government funding. Using retirements of federal contracting officers as a negative shock to contract renewals, I estimate that an additional $1 million in government contract revenue increases R&D spending by only $9,900. The magnitude increases in more competitive contract awards, but overall, federal funding substitutes for private investment, resulting in lower quality patents. Investor Attention and Mutual Fund Performance (with George Aragon, Yuri Tserlukevich, and Mike Wymbs) Abstract: We extend Berk and Green's (2004) model by integrating Miller's (1977) insight on the effects of heterogeneous beliefs and restricted short sales, proposing that higher investor attention not only attracts optimistic inflows but also inflates assets under management and diminishes future fund performance. Using Abnormal View Share (AVS) - a novel measure of investor attention based on SEC EDGAR view data - we find that increased AVS predicts greater fund inflows in the following month but lower returns thereafter. This work underscores how limited attention and optimism impact fund valuations, advancing the intersection of investor attention and market dynamics theories. Mergers and Acquisitions, Diversification, and Downside Risk Abstract: I find that diversifying acquirers experience an increase in downside risk in the medium-term after deal completion. The returns of recent diversifiers are significantly more sensitive to target industry downturns than those of non-diversifying bidders over the first five years post-M&A. Specifically, during downturns, as target industry return decreases by an additional 1pp, the return of recently diversified firms decreases by 1.80pp, while that of recent non-diversifiers decreases by 0.79pp. This difference in sensitivity is not seen in downturns and decreases over the long-term. I show that the risk differential is attributable to operational inexperience and integration.
|
|||||||